<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How is this a surprise?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:58:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OHHH</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3531</link>
		<dc:creator>OHHH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3531</guid>
		<description>You can do better than that CFT, and you know damn well you&#039;re way off, extremely weak comparison. 

-- In this case...
The MAJORITY WHO AGREES is a cross section of AMERICAN PEOPLE with many different views and hopes for the best in their country. 

The MAJORITY WHO DISGREE are a HARDLINE &#039;fuck yall we doing what we want&#039; POLITICAL PARTY in power who refuse to change course, even when the same American people who disagree with them tell them so.

The only ones doing the right thing are the republicans who for the most part are honoring what the MAJORITY of AMERICA wishes. If Obama had a shred of bipartisanship, he&#039;d have gotten a ton of shit done. As we&#039;ve found out, he&#039;s a fraud and way over his head.

You know CTF, you don&#039;t for the most part seem like the typical liberal agenda based me me me kinda guy, but I haven&#039;t seen enough of your responses to validate my hunch. You do go a bit over the top with your thesaurus, but there&#039;s nothing wrong with that.

Frankly, trying to reason with a person in denial (aka most liberal blog posts) is less effective than talking to a wall so I don&#039;t waste my time. I say it like it is - in a nutshell. All in hopes to wake up a few of those who aren&#039;t dedicated to themselves or their idealistic party at the expense of everyone else. When someone proves themselves as an individual thinker capable of standard human reasoning and common sense, then I parley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can do better than that CFT, and you know damn well you&#8217;re way off, extremely weak comparison. </p>
<p>&#8211; In this case&#8230;<br />
The MAJORITY WHO AGREES is a cross section of AMERICAN PEOPLE with many different views and hopes for the best in their country. </p>
<p>The MAJORITY WHO DISGREE are a HARDLINE &#8216;fuck yall we doing what we want&#8217; POLITICAL PARTY in power who refuse to change course, even when the same American people who disagree with them tell them so.</p>
<p>The only ones doing the right thing are the republicans who for the most part are honoring what the MAJORITY of AMERICA wishes. If Obama had a shred of bipartisanship, he&#8217;d have gotten a ton of shit done. As we&#8217;ve found out, he&#8217;s a fraud and way over his head.</p>
<p>You know CTF, you don&#8217;t for the most part seem like the typical liberal agenda based me me me kinda guy, but I haven&#8217;t seen enough of your responses to validate my hunch. You do go a bit over the top with your thesaurus, but there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that.</p>
<p>Frankly, trying to reason with a person in denial (aka most liberal blog posts) is less effective than talking to a wall so I don&#8217;t waste my time. I say it like it is &#8211; in a nutshell. All in hopes to wake up a few of those who aren&#8217;t dedicated to themselves or their idealistic party at the expense of everyone else. When someone proves themselves as an individual thinker capable of standard human reasoning and common sense, then I parley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cft</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3530</link>
		<dc:creator>cft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3530</guid>
		<description>@OHHH:

Oh, so I see your logic. When a &quot;MAJORITY&quot; agrees with you about something, it&#039;s the will of the people. When a &quot;MAJORITY&quot; disagrees with you, then it&#039;s &quot;mooing with the crowd.&quot;

I&#039;m pointing out the emptiness of these rhetorical excesses in an effort to make the case for having an actual political discussion. Why not drop this stuff about: &quot;You damn libs with your drug parties and your rock &#039;n&#039; roll, oh and also with your abortion-loving, communistic elitist fascism...&quot; I mean, you sound like a bad parody of somebody&#039;s alcoholic uncle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@OHHH:</p>
<p>Oh, so I see your logic. When a &#8220;MAJORITY&#8221; agrees with you about something, it&#8217;s the will of the people. When a &#8220;MAJORITY&#8221; disagrees with you, then it&#8217;s &#8220;mooing with the crowd.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pointing out the emptiness of these rhetorical excesses in an effort to make the case for having an actual political discussion. Why not drop this stuff about: &#8220;You damn libs with your drug parties and your rock &#8216;n&#8217; roll, oh and also with your abortion-loving, communistic elitist fascism&#8230;&#8221; I mean, you sound like a bad parody of somebody&#8217;s alcoholic uncle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OHHH</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3525</link>
		<dc:creator>OHHH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3525</guid>
		<description>amazing how when things don&#039;t go the liberal way they try to distance themselves.

Well lets see, the only other nationally recognized and respected polling office is Gallup, which CNN just LOVEs to use cause they&#039;re as liberal as can be.

Lets see what your liberal GALLUP has to say today:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124715/Majority-Americans-Not-Backing-Healthcare-Bill.aspx

OH the same thing? What will phuck do now???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazing how when things don&#8217;t go the liberal way they try to distance themselves.</p>
<p>Well lets see, the only other nationally recognized and respected polling office is Gallup, which CNN just LOVEs to use cause they&#8217;re as liberal as can be.</p>
<p>Lets see what your liberal GALLUP has to say today:<br />
<a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/124715/Majority-Americans-Not-Backing-Healthcare-Bill.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.gallup.com/poll/124715/Majority-Americans-Not-Backing-Healthcare-Bill.aspx</a></p>
<p>OH the same thing? What will phuck do now???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PQ8</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3523</link>
		<dc:creator>PQ8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3523</guid>
		<description>Hellcare, ha, I like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hellcare, ha, I like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phuck Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3520</link>
		<dc:creator>Phuck Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3520</guid>
		<description>@OHHH - I&#039;m sorry, but it&#039;s hard for me to take a Rasmussen Reports poll seriously when it&#039;s founder, Scott Rasmussen, was &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Criticism&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a paid consultant for George W. Bush in 2004&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@OHHH &#8211; I&#8217;m sorry, but it&#8217;s hard for me to take a Rasmussen Reports poll seriously when it&#8217;s founder, Scott Rasmussen, was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Criticism" rel="nofollow">a paid consultant for George W. Bush in 2004</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OHHH</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3518</link>
		<dc:creator>OHHH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3518</guid>
		<description>The difference is, the MAJORITY of Americans don&#039;t put this hellcare garbage even close to important on the radar, and the MAJORITY don&#039;t want want it. The MAJORITY have not wanted it for the MAJORITY of time Obama and his powercrats have been in office.

&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The majority are not fooled and do NOT WANT your powergrab disguised as &#039;healthcare reform&#039;&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference is, the MAJORITY of Americans don&#8217;t put this hellcare garbage even close to important on the radar, and the MAJORITY don&#8217;t want want it. The MAJORITY have not wanted it for the MAJORITY of time Obama and his powercrats have been in office.</p>
<p><a HREF="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform" rel="nofollow">The majority are not fooled and do NOT WANT your powergrab disguised as &#8216;healthcare reform&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PQ8</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator>PQ8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3516</guid>
		<description>Oh man, you and your words...such as &quot;incoherent&quot; and &quot;poop&quot;. You got to stop that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, you and your words&#8230;such as &#8220;incoherent&#8221; and &#8220;poop&#8221;. You got to stop that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worker</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3512</link>
		<dc:creator>Worker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3512</guid>
		<description>Super post, Need to mark it on Digg
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.musgarage.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Worker&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super post, Need to mark it on Digg<br />
 <a href="http://www.musgarage.com/" rel="nofollow">Worker</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cft</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>cft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3509</guid>
		<description>@OHHH:

&lt;i&gt;Interesting you’d single out one guy who doesn’t mooo with the croud [&lt;/i&gt;sic&lt;i&gt;] and call him the power grabber.&lt;/i&gt;

I didn&#039;t call Lieberman a power-grabber; I called him an attention-grabber.

Anyway, your claim that achieving party solidarity in congressional voting is the same thing as &#039;mooing with the crowd&#039; is not only incoherent on its face but selective in its application. It&#039;s the Right that marches in lockstep with the slogans and decrees of its paymasters and demagogues.: its peons and foot-soldiers don&#039;t think, they just repeat what their fat, double-chinned hero Glenn Beck tells them.

Speaking of Glenn Beck: I&#039;ll bet you anything that guy poops his pants. Anybody else get that vibe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@OHHH:</p>
<p><i>Interesting you’d single out one guy who doesn’t mooo with the croud [</i>sic<i>] and call him the power grabber.</i></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t call Lieberman a power-grabber; I called him an attention-grabber.</p>
<p>Anyway, your claim that achieving party solidarity in congressional voting is the same thing as &#8216;mooing with the crowd&#8217; is not only incoherent on its face but selective in its application. It&#8217;s the Right that marches in lockstep with the slogans and decrees of its paymasters and demagogues.: its peons and foot-soldiers don&#8217;t think, they just repeat what their fat, double-chinned hero Glenn Beck tells them.</p>
<p>Speaking of Glenn Beck: I&#8217;ll bet you anything that guy poops his pants. Anybody else get that vibe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PQ8</title>
		<link>http://www.phuckpolitics.com/2009/12/14/how-is-this-a-surprise/comment-page-1/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>PQ8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phuckpolitics.com/?p=2309#comment-3508</guid>
		<description>Croud? Dude, what browser do you use? Seriously, any modern browser highlights typos like that for you, like a word processor would. However, if your just ignoring the squiggly red lines, more power to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Croud? Dude, what browser do you use? Seriously, any modern browser highlights typos like that for you, like a word processor would. However, if your just ignoring the squiggly red lines, more power to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

