It's just green colored paper.

Money is not real:

Of course, much of the world’s elite understand exactly what they’re doing: i.e., use the economic catastrophe they themselves created as a pretext to kill the welfare state they’ve despised for 65 years. Nonetheless, a significant chunk of them actually believe they’re doing the right thing for everyone.

How is this possible? The best explanation I’ve seen appears in a 1994 book by John Ralston Saul called The Doubter’s Companion. It’s a kind of dictionary—the whole book is just him defining and discussing a bunch of words. And one thing he defines is “debt, unsustainable levels of.” Everything you need to understand about our current attempt to obliterate ourselves can be found within it. His most important point is that money is not real. Yet somehow we’ve decided it’s a great idea to stop feeding real food to real people and cease educating real children in order to demonstrate fealty to an abstract concept.

My favorite parts are these, but you should go below the fold and read the whole thing:

A nation cannot make debts sustainable by cutting costs. Cuts may produce marginal savings, but savings are not cash flow. This is another example of the alchemist’s temptation…
Civilizations which become obsessed by sustaining unsustainable debt-loads have forgotten the basic nature of money. Money is not real. It is a conscious agreement on measuring abstract value. Unhealthy societies often become mesmerized by money and treat it as if it were something concrete. The effect is to destroy the currency’s practical value.

I wish someone would inform these cunts about this:

Yesterday, Senator Patty Murray requested unanimous consent on the Homeless Women Veterans and Homeless Veterans with Children Act, a bill she has sponsored that would provide aid to those who have served there country but find themselves with no place to sleep at night.
The days are long gone when I was surprised that Republicans in Washington wouldn’t stand up for Vets, but this is a whole new level. Senate Republicans actually objected to and stood as a road block for providing aid to our Nation’s heroes that are living on the streets, even those with children.

Republicans have no problem with spending trillions of dollars on worthless wars, but when it comes to throwing a little chump change at the poor they bitch like a 16-year-old menstruating girl getting kicked out of a Twilight movie. It’s un-fucking-believable.

Your white owners.

Once again Wall Street has played us for fools:

The financial reform legislation making its way through Congress has Wall Street executives privately relieved that the bill does not do more to fundamentally change how the industry does business.

Despite the outcry from lobbyists and warnings from conservative Republicans that the legislation will choke economic growth, bankers and many analysts think that the bill approved by the Senate last week will reduce Wall Street’s profits but leave its size and power largely intact. Industry officials are also hopeful that several of the most punitive provisions can be softened before it is signed into law.

[...]

“If you talk to anyone privately, there’s a sigh of relief,” said one veteran investment banker who insisted on anonymity because of the delicacy of the issue. “It’ll crimp the profit pool initially by 15 or 20 percent and increase oversight and compliance costs, but there’s no breakup of any institution or onerous new taxes.”

[...]

Still, it could have been worse. The Senate rejected rules that would have broken up huge banks considered “too big to fail,” or imposed limits on their size. Caps on how much banks can charge credit card holders to borrow also fell by the wayside. And the long-established wall between trading and commercial banking, which was torn down in 1999, will not be going back up.

Another reason for relief, several bankers said, is that neither the Senate version of the bill nor the one passed by the House in December includes more populist provisions that have gained a foothold in Europe, like a tax on financial transactions or on individual bonuses.

You really didn’t think any meaningful reform was going to happen, did you? I mean, the Obama administration and key Democrats have been pretty clear about not wanting to upset their pimps. So you should just be grateful that these worthless rules will pass.

As the wise Doug Stanhope once said:”At least black people knew when they where slaves.”

Chris Dodd talking about how he likes to smack the ass while sucking the cock.

Also, the sky is blue, Lebron James will never win a championship, and Chris Dodd is a cunt:

Wall Street is poised to score a victory in its efforts to beat back a crackdown on banks that trade the complex financial products known as derivatives.

On Tuesday, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., proposed a compromise change to the Wall Street reform bill that would water down a proposed ban on derivatives trading by many financial firms.

[...]

Under the changes proposed by Dodd, the swaps ban would be postponed while a council of regulators studies it and recommends to Congress whether the full ban or a partial ban should go forward.

If regulators decide the ban is a bad idea, they must come up with new minimum standards to guide banks about derivative trading. If regulators decide the ban is a good idea, the ban wouldn’t take affect for two years, according to the amendment.

The Senate will have to vote on the changes in coming days, but financial services and derivatives groups were breathing a sigh of relief on Tuesday.

“The proposed solution gives some breathing room to a heavy-handed provision that would have resulted in more risk in the system,” said Scott Talbott, senior lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable.

I wonder if Chris Dodd cups Wall Street’s balls when he’s gobbling Wall Street’s dick?

Fucking pussies.

This made me shit my pants in anger:

Last week, White House officials quietly approached leading financial firms seeking formal letters of support for a Congressional overhaul of financial regulations. One Wall Street powerhouse was left off the list: Goldman Sachs.

Given the government’s lawsuit against Goldman, “the message,” said a financial industry executive involved in the discussions about the White House solicitation, “was that Goldman’s opinion doesn’t matter and that it would be negative if Goldman was supportive of what we were doing.”

Can you imagine White House officials approaching rapists seeking formal letters of support for tougher rape laws? What about approaching murders seeking formal letters of support for tougher murder laws? Or approaching drug users seeking formal letters of support for tougher drug laws?

Fuck no.

Then why the hell does our government feel the need to ask Wall Street for their permission to pass tougher financial laws?

Oh, I see. It all makes sense now.

Sucking off rich white men since 1854.

Shocking, I know:

Senate Republicans held together Monday afternoon to block efforts by Democrats to officially begin debate on the financial industry reform bill.

No Republicans cast a “yes” vote on the procedural motion, keeping Democrats from the 60 vote threshold needed to move forward. One Democrat, Nebraska’s Ben Nelson, voted “no” outright.

[...]

Among the bill’s provisions are the creation of a system for dismantling struggling large firms, the establishment of a consumer protection agency, and a requirement that derivatives be traded openly. The House has already passed its version of the legislation.

[...]

One difference between the two sides is over a proposed Consumer Protection Agency, which Democrats say will keep Americans from being taken advantage of by predatory lenders. Republicans fear the agency could be costly and add an unnecessary and harmful layer of regulation (emphasis mine).

Could someone please give me an example of unnecessary and harmful regulation of Wall Street? Because I’m drawing a blank here. I mean, the reason why our economy went balls up was because of a lack of regulation; which gave way to the rampant fraud on Wall Street.

But then again, what the fuck do I know? I’m not a white-collar criminologist and former financial regulator. But William K. Black is. And he agrees with me:

Control fraud epidemics can arise when financial deregulation and desupervision and perverse compensation systems create a “criminogenic environment”.

Goddammit, I love it when I’m right.

Obama's master.

And nobody seems to care:

The global financial crisis, it is now clear, was caused not just by the bankers’ colossal mismanagement. No, it was due also to the new financial complexity offering up the opportunity for widespread, systemic fraud.

[...]

If the Securities and Exchange Commission’s case is proved – and it is aggressively rebutted by Goldman – the charge is that Goldman’s vice-president Fabrice Tourre created a dud financial instrument packed with valueless sub- prime mortgages at the instruction of hedge fund client Paulson, sold it to investors knowing it was valueless, and then allowed Paulson to profit from the dud financial instrument.

[...]

Brutally, the banks knowingly gamed the system to grow their balance sheets ever faster and with even less capital underpinning them in the full knowledge that everything rested on the bogus claim that their lending was now much less risky. That was not all they were doing. As Michael Lewis describes in The Big Short, credit default swaps had been deliberately created as an asset class by the big investment banks to allow hedge funds to speculate against collateralised debt obligations. The banks were gaming the regulators and investors alike – and they knew full well what they were doing.

[...]

Now it has all collapsed, to be bailed out by western taxpayers. The banks are resisting reform – and want to cling on to the business practices and business model that has so appallingly failed. It is obvious why: it makes them very rich. The politicians tread carefully, only proposing what the bankers say is congruent with their definition of what banking should be.

Let me repeat that last sentence for you:

The politicians tread carefully, only proposing what the bankers say is congruent with their definition of what banking should be.

That sentence is the reason why I’m not surprised at the pussified bill put forth by Chris Dodd. It’s the reason why I’m not surprised Obama sent Rahm Emanuel to New York to host a private meeting begging investors not to flee the Democratic Party. And it’s the reason why I won’t be surprised when nothing happens to Goldman Sachs.

Because our masters expect us to apologize to them for flinching when they cum on our faces.

Where are the black people?

We need to shove a couple of dicks in these guys’ mouths:

During the national furor that erupted last year after American International Group paid more than $165 million in bonuses, the voices of those vilified for receiving the payments remained silent, at least in public.

But behind closed doors, employees at AIG’s Financial Products division — the very unit whose trading had hastened the insurance giant’s collapse — were defiant, saying they were merely getting what they were due, recoiling at public accusations that they were behind their capitalizing on the company’s massive taxpayer bailout.

“I will stand behind every action I have taken in this company from Day One,” one employee said, according to a newly obtained transcript of a conference call the division’s head held last March with some of his staff.

But when another employee asked whether the staff would be getting a second round of bonuses promised for March 2010, his colleagues burst into laughter, apparently considering this a preposterous notion amid the public outrage.

Yet they did see that money, at least most of it. Last month, under a deal in which employees agreed to take a cut in their upcoming retention bonuses in return for an accelerated payment, AIG paid out about $100 million to employees at the firm. AIG is scheduled to pay the last of the bonuses this month.

Even so, neither time nor money has softened the employees’ feelings of wrongful persecution and their anger over becoming the subjects of scorn and ridicule. Seldom was that sense of victimhood more clear or more visceral than in the conference call of March 23, 2009.

[...]

The employees said that the corporate leaders who had driven the firm into the ground were already gone from the company. Those who had remained behind to help clean up the mess and repay the taxpayer bailout were due their compensation, they told Pasciucco.

“You made a commitment to us, and we made a commitment to you. And for anybody to look beyond that, as the politics and the media are at the moment, is missing the point,” said an employee. “You can’t expect us to just roll over and ignore that commitment because there is a bunch of immoral bigots that intend us to do something different. It’s not going to happen.”

Another was even more irate, lashing out at the public for scapegoating AIG employees. “To be honest with you, I really hope it blows up. I think the U.S. taxpayer deserves to lose a trillion dollars over this thing for the way they have behaved.”

And then he turned on politicians who had joined the anti-AIG posse. “They only care about the next election, just like we only care about the next bonus. Well, none of them cares about the country, none of us cares about the institution,” he said, adding: “They really don’t care, and I really don’t care. And frankly, if a trillion dollars gets lost, fine.”

The AIG retention bonuses have rankled many in the public because the company has received a federal rescue package of about $180 billion in loans, stock investments and other commitments from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. Closing down AIG Financial Products’ trading portfolio has been vital to stemming further losses and repaying the public money.

Wall Street’s like that slutty, crazy chick in high school who let you in her back door, and you put up with her ungrateful attitude and lack of loyalty because of it.

But one day you wake up and realize that putting your dick in the shit hole of a crazy person isn’t that great. Plus, you find out she’s been talking to her friends about how whipped you are and how you never follow through with your threats.

So you tell the whole school during morning announcements how you fucked the slutty, crazy chick in the ass while listening to Fleetwood Mac’s “Don’t StopBelievin’”, and that you’re breaking up with her because she’s an ungrateful, gold-digging cunt.

Then you hook up with that sweet next-door neighbor chick who worships the ground you walk on. (Bonus: she swallows.)

See, that’s what our government needs to do. They need to call a press conference and calmly tell Wall Street to go fuck themselves. Then they need to use the trillions of dollars they where giving Wall Street to build schools, homes, and jobs for the people.

But our government won’t do that, because they love to fuck the slutty, crazy chick in the ass. No matter how much they get shitted on.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said on Tuesday the U.S. economic recovery was “extremely unbalanced,” driven largely by high earners benefiting from recovering stock markets and large corporations.

Small businesses and the jobless are still suffering from the aftermath of a credit crunch that was “by far the greatest financial crisis, globally, ever” — including the 1930s Great Depression, said Greenspan in an address to a Credit Union National Association conference.

How is this old, crusty cunt not in jail? He’s robbed millions of people of homes, jobs, and pensions by deregulating and slashing interest rates during his 19-year stint as head of the Fed. Oh, that’s right. He’s not in jail because he’s a rich, white man who helped those corporations he’s bad-mouthing make billions of dollars.

If Joseph Andrew Stack really wanted to shake up the system he would have crashed his plane into Alan Greenspan’s home. Of course, that would have taken some planning, and we all know people on the left can’t plan things for shit.

How else would you explain this:

At a time of increasing debate over the optimal relationship between government and business in the U.S., new Gallup polling shows that 57% of Americans are worried that there will be too much government regulation of business, while 37% worry that there will not be enough. Half of Americans believe the government should become less involved in regulating and controlling business, with 24% saying the government should become more involved and 23% saying things are about right.

This is like a bizzaro French Revolution where Americans take to the streets to support the Corporations that are stealing their money and fucking their daughters.

Could someone explain to me why these cunts aren’t in jail?

Senators who oversee the $700 billion Wall Street rescue package held stocks in many of the banks bailed out towards the end of last year, according to financial disclosure reports released Friday.

According to the reports detailing senators’ finances in 2008, nearly half of the members of the Senate Banking Committee had holdings in financial institutions that have taken funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). The panel has jurisdiction over the bailout fund and other relief efforts directed by federal regulators to save the nation’s financial system.

Nevermind. I know why these pussies aren’t in jail. These twats aren’t in jail because most Americans don’t give a shit about this kind of stuff.

They don’t give a shit about Sen. Tim Johnson having $115,000 dollars in Bank of America stocks. They don’t give a shit about Sen. Chuck Schumer having $50,000 dollars in Morgan Stanley stocks and $15,000 dollars in Citibank stocks. They don’t give a shit about Sen. David Vitter having $15,000 dollars in Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase stocks.

Most Americans don’t give a shit about this kind of stuff because they’re too busy watching that goddamn Jon and Kate plus 8 show. I mean, Jesus fucking Christ, more Americans care about some worthless cunt raising eight goddamn kids than they are about the government stealing their money and giving it to the rich.

But this isn’t surprising since most Americans are to fucking stupid to care about shit like this. And maybe that’s what I need to do.

Maybe I need to stop caring about issues like illegal wars, mutilple bailouts, and political corruption. Maybe I need to stop thinking for myself and let radio and television personalities tell me what to think.

Or maybe I should try to educate Americans. Maybe I should try to show them how bad the government is fucking them over. Maybe I should try to explain to them how issues like gay marriage, gun control and abortion are distracting them from the real problems of illegal wars, mutilple bailouts, and political corruption.

Who the fuck am I kidding? I’m not going to do any of that shit. Besides, do you know how fucking stupid most Americans are? I mean, most Americans thought David Letterman was talking about Sarah Palin’s 14-year-old daughter getting raped by Alex Rodriguez for fuck’s sake.

So fuck all this rhetorical bullshit. I’m just going to continue to do what I’ve always done: smoke weed, jerk-off to some classic 80′s porn, and cry myself to sleep.